Last updated: 2026-11-06
Downloads: Excel files (in German)
| File | Purpose | Version | Framework | Guidance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAIT-DORA mapping (xlsx, in German) | maps each paragraph of BAIT (BaFin’s supervisory requirements for IT in banks) to the provisions in DORA and the RTS, with status, continuing obligation and suitable evidence | version 2.1, 6 November 2026 | both, shown separately | BAIT and DORA |
| Register of information filling aid (xlsx, in German) | shows on a completed sample contract how to fill in the fields of the templates, with a checklist | 6 November 2026 | both, not for microenterprises of the KWG group | Register of information |
Notes on use are on the respective topic page. The files reflect our status as of the date shown. Later changes to the regulation or to BaFin guidance are not included. Both files are in German.

Work products on the topic and service pages
These templates appear as tables on the respective page, mostly completed for a fictitious sample company. You can adopt them and adapt them for your organisation. The list covers all work products on this website.
Classify
| Work product | Purpose | Framework | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading map of the regulation | leads from the question to the article and to the in-depth page | both | DORA regulation |
| Classification record | records whether DORA applies and under which framework | both | DORA applicability |
| Level 2 map with corrigenda table | lists all RTS, ITS and guidelines with reference and framework, plus the corrigenda to the German version | both | DORA RTS and ITS |
| Classification record for an investment firm | evidences the nine conditions of Article 12(1) IFR, including group values | Article 16 | Investment firms |
| Classification record for an IORP | counts the members and records the reading applied | Article 16 | IORPs and pension funds |
| Decision table DORA and NIS2 | assigns, per obligation and legal entity, which regime applies, with the example of a banking group | both | DORA and NIS2 |
| Check scheme with two check records | documents whether an insurance intermediary falls under DORA | intermediaries | Insurance intermediaries |
Build and rebuild the framework
| Work product | Purpose | Framework | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obligations matrix with an extract for a fund management company | shows each DORA obligation with reference and framework | both | DORA requirements |
| List for rebuilding BAIT documents | classifies BAIT documents: keep, slim down or replace | both | BAIT and DORA |
| Transition plan for an insurer | transfers VAIT documents to DORA and MaGo | full framework | DORA for insurers |
| Interface matrix MaRisk and DORA | shows for each MaRisk module which document leads and which refers to it | both | MaRisk and DORA |
| Transition plan for a fund management company | transfers KAIT documents to DORA, KAMaRisk and the KAGB | full framework | KAIT and DORA |
| Checklist “What is still missing from the ZAIT era” | finds documents without a DORA basis at payment and e-money institutions | full framework | ZAIT and DORA |
| Evidence matrix, annual calendar and sample evidence folder | assigns evidence to each article of RTS Title III, the calendar sets the dates of the first year of operation | Article 16 | DORA Article 16 |
| Factoring sample case with exercise records | links function, provider, risk, measure and evidence | Article 16 | Factoring and leasing |
| Outline of the framework with a BIA extract | shows how a framework under Articles 5 to 15 can be structured | full framework | ICT risk management |
| ISO 27001 mapping and ISMS comparison | maps clauses and Annex A to the DORA obligations and shows what an ISMS does not deliver | both | DORA and ISO 27001 |
| Outline of the reference architecture with an inventory entry | links architecture, dependencies and inventories under Article 8 | full framework | ICT reference architecture |
Functions, providers and register
| Work product | Purpose | Framework | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| List of functions with reasons | classifies functions as critical or important | both | Critical or important functions |
| Filling aid with a sample contract | shows the fields of the register on one contract, also as an Excel file above | both, not for microenterprises of the KWG group | Register of information |
| Contract checklist | checks an ICT contract against the mandatory terms under Article 30 | both, not for microenterprises of the KWG group | ICT third-party service providers |
| Completed client questionnaire | shows how an ICT provider answers requests from financial clients | providers | DORA for ICT providers |
Testing, business continuity, incidents and audit
| Work product | Purpose | Framework | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classification sheet and exercise playbook | classifies an incident and plans a reporting exercise | both | Reporting ICT-related incidents |
| Testing plan with finding classes | plans a year’s tests and sets how findings are handled | full framework, under Article 16 as the plan under RTS Article 36 | Resilience testing |
| Outline of the business continuity plan and test record | shows the components of the plan with references and records a failover exercise | both | ICT business continuity |
| Preparation list for an audit | names documents, references and contacts for internal audit, statutory auditors and supervisors | both | DORA audit |
Examples on the service pages
| Work product | Purpose | Framework | Page |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample result of a gap analysis | shows an extract from a fictitious report | Article 16 | DORA gap analysis |
| Sample timeline for the switch | shows the process for a start in November 2026 | Article 16 | Transition from BAIT |
| Agenda for the management body briefing | six modules with times and references for each framework | both | DORA training |
What the templates do and do not do
The templates are general work aids. They do not replace an assessment of the individual case or legal advice, and they say nothing about how supervisors or auditors will assess your documents. If you want to adapt a template for your organisation and are looking for support, start with the DORA gap analysis.
Frequently asked questions
Which template should we start with?+
How current are the templates?+
Are the work products on the topic pages also available as Excel files?+
Read more
- BAIT and DORA: repeal, transition and the mapping as Excel
- DORA register of information: structure, mandatory fields, submission
- DORA Article 16: the simplified ICT risk management framework
- DORA requirements: obligations matrix for the full framework and Article 16
- DORA RTS and ITS: every level 2 act with its official reference
- DORA gap analysis: quick check, Article 16 and full framework
Sources
- Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA) (retrieved 2026-11-06)
- Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2956 (standard templates for the register of information) (retrieved 2026-11-06)
- BaFin: Circular 10/2017 (BA) BAIT, version of 16 December 2024, in German (retrieved 2026-11-06)
This content provides general technical and organisational information and does not constitute legal advice (no legal services within the meaning of the German RDG).
